We don’t move from particular ideological, political or religious positions, and we are completely open to people of any ethnic group, colour, religious and/or political faith.

This is a new way of thinking, or better, an attempt to found a new phylosophical current, deeply and strongly humanist, against other currents (i.e., giving priority to the defense of the nature).

We're trying to move at the level of the philosophy, that is under the level of the politics and of the religions, just like the foundations of a building are under the walls and the rooms, because I think that this is the level were we need more new elaboration (and I didn’t yet try to derivate a political thought from this).

We are present to a deep and irreversible crisis of the philosophies those stimulated the human development (cultural and technological) in the past 500 years; both the ideas, free trader liberal and collectivist, were based on the unlimited development of the richness and of the production power, therefore on a unlimited availability of natural resources.

The large public opinion is now aware that the resources of this planet are limited, and will not be enough for any number of human beings. New ideologies, based on old principles, will have many difficulties to born, because they can’t anymore to promise a future of abundance, and no new ideology will have luck, promising a future of poverty. Nevertheless, we do need ideologies, in order to develope.

Many currents seems to suggest to the Human Kind to reduce itself, in order to let the Nature solve the problems. But Nature will maybe solve her problems, not our problems.

But our number (almost 6 billions people) is part of the reasons of our success (technological and cultural), and all the above currents don’t understand that, if we stop growing, we will die as a cultural kind: we could maybe survive as animals, until when the natural cycles of the nature will allow it.

The only demographically steady species are the extinguished species; the perfect predators (i.e. sharks) can survive for millions years, they in perfect armony with the nature and its rules, but they must extinguish one day, when the nature cycles will turn to conditions unsuitable for them (what about dynosaurs?).

Mother Earth, as all the natural mothers, will kill her children, if they aren’t able to grow out, looking alone for their food.

The Human Kind is the first kind, on this planet, having the means to exceed the limits imposed by the Nature of the planet itself: a brain and two hands with thumb that can be opposed; no other animal of our dimension reached such a great numerical success.

But we disperately need a new phylosophy, a new vision of the world, a larger vision of the world, we can’t no more to conceive ourself as a species limited to our actual living space: we need a new horizon of development, so we need new world (real new world, and not only a virtual world).

The actual technological-social window will not extend for ever: we leave in a very critical moment, where the Human Kind holds the bigger reachness that never had: the concrete and real Humans alive on the planet, almost 6 billions of intelligences to be used to win the challenge.

If we are not able to ask for the help of everybody, and taking to everybody the scientifical experimental culture, our kind is really condamned.

The concept of “sustainable development” is a big lie: we can’t measure the sustainability of the planet, therefore we will probably turn to a zero development. We must adopt a concept of “possible development”, that’s a risk, of course, but also to not develope is a risk, thousands of times bigger.

We will no more find free life-space, like 500 years ago, when America was discovered, ready with air to breath, fresh water to drink, woods to cut, bisons to hunt, and so on.

The new world, the vital environment to continue the human development, must be built up, wrenching it to impervious environments on the planet (deserts, cold areas, sea) and out of the planet (circumterrestrial space, moon, mars, asteroids).

The borders of our world are many: the desert (if we don’t fight it, it will gain space from us), the sea, the cold environments, the impervious environments, the extreme agricolture, the transport means (to travel out of the borders), the medicine (to take all the human biodiversities in the new world), the big projects (integrated new towns, long bridges on the sea, tunnels), the energy, the study and experimentation of self-maintaining artificial eco-systems (maybe the most important), and many more.

The sustainable development thought says that we can’t exceed these frontiers, but we absolutely must exceed them, in an intelligent way, having the ecological lesson in our background, but without accept any limitation to our development.

The discussion on these themes is very weak, and the Human Kind’s defenders need a powerful tool (like the Nature’s partizans have the WWF) to speak high to all the people, to defend the Technological and Scientifical Research and the scientific culture as the only means that we have to win the challenge and to born in a wider space.

Nobody can sleep peacefully: all the accumulated patrimonies, will be noth worth a fig; without the work and the technology the patrimonies will be only waste-paper. The stock exchanges will burn in three days our hard-earned money.

The capital, if it isn't intelligently invested, it doesn't serve to anything, on the countrary, it is a dangerous element of illusion, because it makes us feel to be in safety, while we are in extreme danger.

The only real capital is the human work, the creative intelligence: this can really get future for us. Therefore we must put hand to the purse without fear, to keep alive the technology, to instruct and to turn in account the human capital, the only resource surely plentiful, cheap and renewable on our planet.